it’s not that i make an active effort to avoid trendiness. i just don’t care much for the general tastes of the american public. FM pop radio is an abyss that sends me radio-dialling over into the scratchy audio of AM talk radio for nothing else than to get something spontaneous and real. i did a quiet little dance of joy when oprah winfrey stopped rubber-stamping the latest booksellers, like some queen of culture’s official seal of blessing. reality-based programming was tired and dead even before it began and is only getting more and more inane, like a carnival freak show without any charm or mystery. but i have to admit something.
i get a kick out of american idol.
i think it is because i was in london at the very end of the original british run of the show. it was big time entertainment over there, the talk of all the pop music stations. the airwaves were rife with rumour and commentary about the viability of a fellow named will over some other guy named gareth. there were editorial cartoons about the winners in the daily mirror. it was fascinating and fun, something i couldn’t help but be aware of, though i never saw a single episode during my stay.
so when i heard it was coming here, i was very interested. knowing that american runs of british television shows can be hit or miss, my expectations weren’t too high, just fueled by a healthy curiosity. and have i been rewarded for my curiosity? i have seen about five episodes, usually when i manage somehow to escape tuesday night rehearsal (and can distract my roommate from his hideous addiction to law & order). i’ve watched the numbers dwindle down through the last couple of months from a double-handful to just three, and i have been impressed with some and terribly disappointed with others. if you’ve never seen the show, here is the rundown: two hosts, idiots both, introduce and shepherd the contestants who step out on stage and sing about a minute and a half of a given pop song before three judges (randy the record producer, paula abdul the used-to-be and simon the a & r guy) who then give their opinions on their performance. randy starts off every comment with either “man, I’ll tell you what…” (regardless of the performer’s gender) or a woody-like repeating of the contestant’s names (”kelly, kelly, kelly, kelly…”), followed by a rather simple liked-it or disliked-it comment. paula abdul has nothing bad to say about anyone. ever. and she cries at random moments, suffers hit-ons from one of the two hosting tools, makes threats about stealing contestants legs-voice-hair-etc and otherwise just sits there drinking from her big red coca-cola cup like a good little corporate shill. and then there is simon. people hate simon. they think he is brash and insultant, mean and hateful, tactless and vile. me? i love simon. simon is the voice in the back of each performer’s head that checks their ego. simon is the one that will actually tell someone who cannot sing that, hey, they just cannot sing. he likes to remind everyone there that the purpose of the show is to find a new pop star - not to find someone who is plucky with a can-do attitude - and half-ass just will not do. now, do they decide who stays or goes? no. the american public makes that choice through phone calls. these phone calls, in this age of survivor-made vocabulary, “vote off” one person per week.
and now we are down to the last three. the last one to fall, tamyra, is from norcross. in fact, three or four of the contestants were from right around the atlanta area. i liked tamyra, finding her voice consistent and her reads of established material were skillful and memorable. the others are justin, nikki and kelly. justin annoys the hell out of me, yet he remains a proclaimed favorite with almost any woman versed in the subject. its the hair, this kind of a white-boy ‘fro that orbits his head like a reddish dust cloud. can he sing? well, it is hard to tell if he is really singing, or just doing a well-practiced impression of maxwell. nikki is every teenage girl that wants to grow up and be gwen stefani or pink or avril lavigne, and sounds like it too. no, she doesn’t sound like those idols, she just sounds like she’s the kind of girl that drags her mall-going friends out to karaoke just so she can get up and sing “don’t speak” or “get this party started” one more freakin’ time. and then there is kelly. you want my endorsement for this charade? kelly is the real article. she is not perfect, still has some stage presence to develop, but her voice is solid as can be and she knows exactly how to use it. and she carries herself on stage with an ease that is going to continue to improve as her confidence grows. will winning this contest make her a pop star? probably not. she will probably put out one album, it will sell like syruppy flapjacks for a month or two, then she will fade into a temporary obscurity. and then it will be up to her to decide what to do with her life, whether to establish her own, post-American Idol persona, or to just let herself remain “that girl who won that show.”
because if you don’t firmly place yourself on a successful pedestal of your own making, you’re going to fall when they take your pedestal away and give it to the next big thing. the tastes of this country have always been fickle and they will remain so. ask any one-hit wonder.