Wrong And Wrong

This afternoon, I cursed my car stereo.

I heard our President’s remarks at the Virginia Tech convocation, and cursed in disbelief.

In a democracy, the offering of condolence is an accepted part of a statesman’s job. Just as there are ribbon cuttings, ground breakings, and state dinners, there will be times of shared hurt with your constituency. When one is elected, it is for thick and thin, good and bad. Now, for the higher offices, like that of a Senator or a President, a show of support in times of sadness is a relatively simple matter. The mere act of taking time out of a known-to-be busy schedule to appear at a family’s side or to be present at a memorial ceremony, that can mean the world to all involved.

It takes very little.

Only a day after the shootings at Virginia Tech, President Bush was there. The logistics of moving a U.S. President aside, as I’m sure the local authorities already had their hands full with the investigation, I’m sure the people of Blacksburg overlooked any inconvenience and were comforted that he and wife Laura made such an effort to attend this afternoon’s memorial convocation at Cassell Colliseum.

And yet … that was not enough.

Opportunity presented itself, so our President spoke. Before the assembled crowd, he offered remarks. Typically, these are the times when statesmen shine, possibly because they can feel the sense of longing from those in attendance. With so many wanting some modicum of reassurance, how can anyone help but try to sustain them, even a little?

Now, I know that our President is no Bill Clinton. He’s no Reagan or Kennedy. But still …

He started off as expected, thanking his hosts and all in attendance. He explained why he and his wife had come to Blacksburg, that they came bearing sympathy and an assurance that America shares their grief. Then he delved into a brief recounting of the events of yesterday, saying how events took a “dark turn” that likely established that day as “the worst day of your lives.”

And then he said this:

It’s impossible to make sense of such violence and suffering. Those whose lives were taken did nothing to deserve their fate. They were simply in the wrong place at the wrong time. Now they’re gone — and they leave behind grieving families, and grieving classmates, and a grieving nation.

This is when I cursed.

How dare he? How dare he? Read it again.

They were simply in the wrong place at the wrong time. Wrong place? Wrong time? No, sir, I beg to differ. For all of the unanswered questions we may forever have about just what went on at Virginia Tech on April 16th, I can assure anyone concerned that those who fell were most certainly in the right place at the right time. They were in class as their college schedule dictated. They were taking exams according to someone’s syllabus. They were exactly where they were meant to be at the very time they were to be there.

They were simply in the wrong place at the wrong time. That’s what you say when some unfortunate tourist loses their Fodor’s and walks into a back-alley meth lab full of drug-addled thugs at 2am. But Virginia Tech is an American college campus, one that was relatively sedate up until the odd bomb scares of last week, and even that threat was merely potential, not actual.

They were simply in the wrong place at the wrong time. Did someone write this for you, sir? If so, fire them. Immediately. After looking over the remainder of the remarks — which I read and did not hear — I’m guessing that someone else did compile the rest of his observations. The later references to “dorm rooms and dining halls and on blogs” kind of gives the game away.

It has been said before, but rarely has the proof of it been made more clear than with this absolutely uninspired assessment. Our President is intellectually lazy. This sounds like an accusation that only an English Major could level, but this kind of laziness is incredibly detrimental and arguably dangerous. Obviously, the President meant nothing malicious with this remark, but he really didn’t give the statement much thought either. Words like these, particularly in times of suffering (even at a micro level, right in the Blacksburg community), deserve thought and consideration.

I’ve never made it a secret that I wish our President were someone other than he is. To this day, I still have moments of yearning that can best be described with the initials W.W.J.B.D. — What Would Jed Bartlett Do? And while the race for 2008 is giving me hope, far more than I had ever in 2004, I fear for the lasting damage that will be left behind by our current President’s sheer lack of empathy, of humility and of common sense.

And any hopes for impeachment not withstanding, the best any of us can do until January 20, 2009 is to keep cursing the car stereo.

[tags]Virginia Tech, Bush’s Last Day, Wrong Place, intellectually lazy[/tags]

  • Janice

    I also believe that the first statement that came out from the White House regarding the tragedy was about Bush’s support of the right to own guns in America.

    32 people – shot down in cold blood while going about their daily business – and Bush supports guns in America. It just makes you shake your head in disbelief

  • http://blog.garrettvonk.com Garrett

    [...] I can assure anyone concerned that those who fell were most certainly in the right place at the right time.

    I’m not here to defend the President’s intellectual laziness, but I think the phrase can be interpreted differently from the meaning with which you take issue.

    See, I think the meaning should be taken in the context of “A bunch of people were sitting in a classroom minding their own business in one moment and had been shot to death the next.” If you Google the phrase “wrong place at the wrong time”, there are many other examples of the saying being used in similar contexts. In fact, it seems like a common thing to say to indicate that the victims of violent circumstances just happened to be in a given location at a given time, and that these two near-random variables were all it took to make them victims. The choice of these words generally has nothing to do with condemning their choice of location or time, but rather is an attempt to convey the senselessness of the act and the innocence of the victims.

    It seems like there was nothing in these victims’ actions or choices that caused them to meet their end at this killer’s hands. He busted into a classroom without speaking and started shooting. It’s not like there was a barroom brawl or he was out for revenge against someone who had wronged him. (As far as we know.) It could have been any other classroom at any other time. The slain men and women just happened to be in the room during that period, when he just happened to decide to start killing. They indeed “did nothing to deserve their fate”. It became the wrong place and became the wrong time the moment the mass murder started. That’s the whole point of the phrase.

  • Thomas

    Respectfully, Garrett, I disagree.

    While anyone can see that the decisions and actions of a broken man turned an otherwise safe situation into one steeped in horror, thus turning right places and times into wrong ones, I cannot give President Bush a pass on his choice of words.

    The President did not say only that these people were in the wrong place at the wrong time. He added another word. An adverb. Simply. And with that addition, the phrase becomes presumptively explanatory at best and dismissive at worst. He might as well have just said, “Shit happens.”

    Admittedly, this is true. Bad things happen all of the time to people who do not deserve it. But there is a time and a place to admit this cold, heartless fact of life. A memorial convocation is no such place. The day after a tragedy is no such time.

    “The future doesn’t belong to the fainthearted; it belongs to the brave.”

    That was something President Reagan said back in January of 1986, mere hours after the Challenger disaster. He was scheduled that night to deliver the State of the Union, but decided to address the hearts of a shocked nation instead. In particular, the words I quoted were from a portion of his remarks directed at me, one of “the school children of America” who watched the explosion repeatedly through the day. And I’ve never forgotten it.

    At no time during his speech did President Reagan ever resign the deaths of those aboard to any whims of fate. In stark contrast, President Bush most surely did.

    “You have lost too much, but you have not lost everything. And you have certainly not lost America, for we will stand with you for as many tomorrows as it takes.”

    Words from President Clinton, addressing those gathered at a memorial service for the Oklahoma Bombing in 1995. And like Reagan before him, not once in his speech does he let fate alone take possession of those loved ones lost.

    Examples can be cited again and again, all of them available lessons to teach a President how best to offer comfort to a nation that needs it.

    I said it in my original post and I will say it here again. I don’t believe that the President meant his remarks to be disparaging. Not at all. But that doesn’t keep his poor choice of words from being what they were: cliched, uninspired and lacking in thought that typically informs compassion.

    And if you remain unconvinced, consider this. Say you knew one of those who were lost. Perhaps they were a friend or part of your family. Already hurt, your need for answers is deep. So to is your desire for comfort. Given the state you’re in, if someone walked up to you, clapped you on the shoulder and said “They were simply in the wrong place at the wrong time,” what would your reaction be?

  • http://blog.garrettvonk.com Garrett

    He added another word. An adverb. Simply. And with that addition, the phrase becomes presumptively explanatory at best and dismissive at worst.

    It still seems to me that he was making a point about the complete lack of a connection between killer and victims (in the second wave of the spree, not the initial dorm room deaths). He didn’t say it out of the blue, like your hypothetical. He said “[They] did nothing to deserve their fate. They were simply in the wrong place at the wrong time.” The second sentence, especially the simply, expands on the futility expressed in the first. Yes, it’s a cliché. But maybe the words were indeed intended to be comforting. Our collective, stunned outrage leads us to question why our friends or family members would suffer so, and the president registers his own outrage and grief that they would die so senselessly too. It still seems to me a sensible thing to say, though not very creative.

    And maybe it’s the wrong thing for a president to say. Shouldn’t a statesman be more reactive and make bolder proclamations than (essentially) “Their deaths were senseless”? So, my analysis is that it’s kind of weak, but not worth calling “potentially dangerous” or firing a speechwriter over. Your post seems to be hung up on the literal meaning of the saying, and I just don’t think he meant it that way.

    Again, not a Bush apologetic. Just respectfully disagreeing with your analysis.

  • http://www.grabbingsand.org/wordpress/ Thomas

    And maybe it’s the wrong thing for a president to say.

    That’s it. Entirely, that is the root of my problem. Presidents are supposed to be better than this. And after six years and change of increasingly ineffective leadership, I’m just flat out tired of it.

    I know you’re no apologist. Who really could be with a straight face?

    And maybe I’m lockjawing on this matter too tightly.

    But please, next time around, could we just have a President that doesn’t embarrass so many of us at every word? One that sounds as if he or she has finished a book or three? One that could conceivably inspire us to be better than we are or to just remind us to be more than we’ve been?

  • Kathryn

    But please, next time around, could we just have a President that doesn’t embarrass so many of us at every word? One that sounds as if he or she has finished a book or three? One that could conceivably inspire us to be better than we are or to just remind us to be more than we’ve been?

    AMEN!!!!

    Speaking of speaking as a President… I was recently at the US Holocaust Museum and was looking at Bill Clinton’s quote, etched into the wall next to the entrance,

    “This museum will touch the life of everyone who enters and leave everyone forever changed — a place of deep sadness and a sanctuary of bright hope; an ally of education against ignorance, of humility against arrogance, an investment in a secure future against whatever insanity lurks ahead. If this museum can mobilize morality, then those who have perished will thereby gain a measure of immortality.”
    Source: William J. Clinton, 42nd President of the United States, Dedication Ceremonies for the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, April 22, 1993.

    Standing at the museum’s entrance, pondering the former President’s words, I was struck by how unlikely it is that our current President could (or would) ever come up with something so eloquent.